Socially Drinking At Computer

>complain about the US for years
>leave
>find out its actually worse elsewhere

Many such cases
replies
10
announces
9
likes
13

@prettygood good country won't be named after depiction of hell from Minecraft

@a1ba zoomers need to find a different game smh

@prettygood We needed the GNU State yesterday tbh.

@prettygood many such cases

@prettygood this is the same in germany, people in most countries have no idea.

@Suiseiseki I'd take a BDFL system over *gesturing vaguely*

I was telling an American about the car taxes in most EU nations the other day. ๐Ÿ˜†

@prettygood and he think this is because of 'landlords' and not because of extremely pro-tenant laws that make it very easy to lose lots of money on a bad tenant, so of course everyone is being vetted as if they were about to join the CIA

@prettygood I'd be more of a supreme leader than a benevolent dictator, although that'll mostly consist of me doing absolutely nothing.

@lain you mean my RIGHTS comes with RESPONSIBILITIES? This is so not :100: wholesome chungus luxury space communism smh my head

@prettygood > complays about the USA
> moves to fucking europe

Ffs dude

@lain @prettygood i got bored explaining that part to people.

how feedback effects work.

when you make it impossible to fire someone, you make it impossible to get hired. and so on.

Americans have to pay taxes to the US even if they emigrate the rest of their lives. the only country with such a norm ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

@Dicey @prettygood wtf? That's fucking vile

Now i get how everyone there is insane

@prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer Holy shit. Why? Is it really that bad? I thought it was bad that I had to provide my SSN, employer information, pay-stubs and tax return documentation, and submit to a credit check just to apply for an apartment. Housing out be a human right, it should be accessible and affordable.

@adiz quinn said it best: "when you make it impossible to fire someone, you make it impossible to get hired. and so on."

@prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer Idk how that applies. All I know is that housing should not be viewed as an investment item, it should be a widespread commodity, it should be easy to access and afford. It's the baseline by which wealth can be generated for individuals---if you're homeless, if it's virtually impossible to lock down good, secure property with which you can start amassing wealth and/or building roots, if the majority of your paycheck goes towards paying rent...you're not going to get anywhere. You're fucked. Like spinning your tires around in mud.

@icedquinn @lain @prettygood you think that's bad try explaining incentives

@adiz I don't disagree with a lot of the sentiment but I have to concede that people should be allowed to own property and use / rent it as they see fit.

Companies shouldn't. A person has rights, a company has privileges.

@lain @prettygood the stuff im most angry about is Schufa. private company and a black box which decides if u are credible or not. u cannot not become their customer for many things here.

@prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer I do agree. I think housing should be both incentivized and penalized. It's the same exact idea I have with children. E.g.

First X (house or child) is subsidized. Second X provides zero assistance or subsidies or rewards. All subsequent X confer penalties which increase with every additional X.

Make it easy for people to have a home and to have children. Make it super fucking expensive for people to have 5 homes or 5 kids, for example.

@prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer heh, this reminds me some dude looking for a white country that was against the US, but wasn't socialist or communist because he didn't want his kids to be assimilated by globohomo. That poor soul isn't ready for reality โ€‹laugh_about_itโ€‹

@lain @prettygood I'm really glad I dipped out of that market the first chance I had

@prettygood Itโ€™s so funny how often this happens. I remember reading about a trans man who moved from Massachusetts to England because they thought it would be better and you could just taste the regret. I donโ€™t think they even lasted 6 months.

@Dicey @sun_eat3r @prettygood Iโ€™m not saying itโ€™s right but the reason they justify it with is that as a US citizen, you benefit from a lot of things due to the USโ€™ status in the world and the protection of their consular services. I do think they should do away with that though.

@arcana @prettygood Lmao why would someone move to England

@adiz @prettygood housing regulations are the problem, let people build and follow basic supply and demand

@adiz @prettygood government shouldnโ€™t be involved at all

@arcana that's really sad. I genuinely sympathize with people who "don't belong" wherever it is that they're living, for whatever reason that is, especially in that way.

@f_o_u_r_t_y @prettygood they think everything is like Harry Potter and Doctor Who and itโ€™s a happy liberal paradise

Reality: https://youtu.be/SS7Vxa2Ys34?si=Cp2AUZxY4oucnlFh

@prettygood Iโ€™ve been trying to go the opposite direction and Iโ€™m hopefully pretty close

@arcana@fedi.layer02.net @Dicey@decayable.ink @sun_eat3r@goreslut.xyz @prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer you can always denounce your american citizenship, nothing (on the US side) is stopping you

@shibao @prettygood @sun_eat3r @Dicey You do need citizenship elsewhere for that as you canโ€™t voluntarily become stateless

@sun_eat3r @prettygood NL in particular has a fucked up housing market
didnโ€™t need any of that for any of the apartments i checked out (germany)

@arcana@fedi.layer02.net Deregulation and privatization has basically always been proven false/failed solutions to problems like this. It's to a point where I consider anyone who assets otherwise to be a bad actor knowingly pushing bad treatments for ulterior motives. @prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer

@prettygood "worse", lolz.